It's not how many dimensions you have, it's what you do with them: Evidence from speech perception

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):31-31 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contrary to Pothos, rule- and similarity-based processes cannot be distinguished by dimensionality. Rather, one must consider the goal of the processing: what the system will do with the resulting representations. Research on speech perception demonstrates that the degree to which speech categories are gradient (or similarity-based) is a function of the utility of within-category variation for further processing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Integrating cues in speech perception.Dominic W. Massaro - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):275-275.
Analytic isomorphism and speech perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):748-749.
Charting speech with bats without requiring maps.Jagmeet S. Kanwal - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):272-273.
Seeing causings and hearing gestures.Stephen Andrew Butterfill - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):405-428.
Fodor, modularity, and speech perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (3):317-330.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
114 (#155,691)

6 months
20 (#129,475)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references