It's not how many dimensions you have, it's what you do with them: Evidence from speech perception

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):31-31 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Contrary to Pothos, rule- and similarity-based processes cannot be distinguished by dimensionality. Rather, one must consider the goal of the processing: what the system will do with the resulting representations. Research on speech perception demonstrates that the degree to which speech categories are gradient (or similarity-based) is a function of the utility of within-category variation for further processing.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is this what the debate on rules was about?Ulrike Hahn - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):25-26.
Fodor, modularity, and speech perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (3):317-330.
The Motor Theory of Speech Perception.Christopher Mole - 2009 - In Matthew Nudds & Casey O'Callaghan (eds.), Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Analytic isomorphism and speech perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):748-749.


Added to PP

21 (#762,792)

6 months
116 (#39,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references