Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions

Artificial Intelligence and Law 31 (1):195-212 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss previous research in automatic prediction of court decisions. We define the difference between outcome identification, outcome-based judgement categorisation and outcome forecasting, and review how various studies fall into these categories. We discuss how important it is to understand the legal data that one works with in order to determine which task can be performed. Finally, we reflect on the needs of the legal discipline regarding the analysis of court judgements.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):303-308.
Editors' introduction.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):157-161.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4):315-320.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):447-452.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1):219-224.
Index of Key Words.[author unknown] - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):347-347.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-25

Downloads
32 (#515,799)

6 months
16 (#171,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?