Authors
Lantz Miller
City University of New York
Abstract
A critique is made of Bernard Rollin''s examination of the ethics of cloning adult mammalian cells. The primary concern is less to propound an anticloning or procloning position than to call for full exploration of the ethical complexities before a rush to judgment is made. Indeed, the ethical examination in question rushes toward an ethical position in such a way that does not appear consistent with Rollin''s usual methodology. By extending this methodology – which entails full weighing of benefits and costs – it becomes apparent that there are real potential risks to this type of cloning in both animals and humans, besides the possible benefits, and that the scientific, political, philosophical, and broader academic communities should explore these risks and benefits extensively. Rollin''s usual methodological call for hesitation before risks would translate into hesitation before the ethical risks of adult mammalian cell cloning instead of his paper''s curiously laissez-faire stance.
Keywords animal adult-cell cloning  human adult-cell cloning  genetic ecology  genetic monoculture  synchronic genetic diversity  diachronic genetic diversity  rights of future generations
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1007761031092
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,864
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
48 ( #215,367 of 2,433,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #463,180 of 2,433,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes