Racial and Ethnic Categories in Biomedical Research: There is no Baby in the Bathwater

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):497-499 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of racial categories in biomedicine has had a long history in the United States. However, social hierarchy and discrimination, justified by purported scientific differences, has also plagued the history of racial categories. Because “race” has some correlation with biological and genetic characteristics, there has been a call not to “throw the baby out with the bathwater” by eliminating race as a research or clinical category. I argue that race is too undefined and fluid to be useful as a proxy for biology or genetics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Biology of Race: Searching for No Overlap.Myles W. Jackson - 2014 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 57 (1):87-104.
Debating the Use of Racial and Ethnic Categories in Research.Susan M. Wolf - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):483-486.
The justification of race in biological explanation.L. Lorusso - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (9):535-539.
Genes, race and research ethics: who's minding the store?L. M. Hunt & M. S. Megyesi - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):495-500.
Race, Money and Medicines.M. Gregg Bloche - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):555-558.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
57 (#288,857)

6 months
21 (#133,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1898 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.

Add more references