Philosophy of Science 54 (2):256-265 (1987)

Cheryl Misak
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Isaac Levi uses C. S. Peirce's fallibilism as a foil for his own "epistemological infallibilism". I argue that Levi's criticisms of Peirce do not hit their target, and that the two pragmatists agree on the fundamental issues concerning background knowledge, certainty, revision of belief, and the aims of inquiry
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289374
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Epistemic and the Zetetic.Jane Friedman - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (4):501-536.
Reasoning About Knowledge Using Defeasible Logic.Douglas Walton - 2011 - Argument and Computation 2 (2-3):131 - 155.
The Epistemology of Scientific Evidence.Douglas Walton & Nanning Zhang - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (2):173-219.
Statistical Method and the Peircean Account Of Truth.Andrew Reynolds - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):287-314.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
202 ( #48,766 of 2,433,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,810 of 2,433,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes