Is tu Wei-Ming confucian?

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):397-411 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wei-ming’s discourse has been badly understood by some Western philosophers who study Confucianism. I suggest that this misunderstanding stems from the fact that these philosophers fail to realize that Confucian discourse is in an entirely different register from Western philosophical discourse. I then propose my own preliminary definition of Confucian discourse in five points and present a structural analysis of a text by Tu Wei-ming. Finally, I consider which features of Tu’s discourse can properly be called Confucian. The answer to this question reflects not only on Tu but also on Confucian discourse and the study of Confucianism in general

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#298,568)

6 months
11 (#230,695)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eske Møllgaard
University of Rhode Island

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Concluding Unscientific Postscript.Søren Kierkegaard - 2019 - Princeton University Press.
Detour and access: strategies of meaning in China and Greece.François Jullien - 2000 - New York: Zone Books. Edited by Sophie Hawkes.
The normative impact of comparative ethics: Human rights.Chad Hansen - 2004 - In Kwong-loi Shun & David B. Wong (eds.), Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 72--99.
Philosophy of Change.Chung-Ying Cheng - 2003 - In A. S. Cua (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 517-524.

View all 8 references / Add more references