Mental health, big data and research ethics: Parity of esteem in mental health research from a UK perspective

Clinical Ethics 14 (4):165-172 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Central to ethical debates in contemporary mental health research are the rhetoric of parity of esteem, challenges underpinned by the social construct of vulnerability and the tendency to homogenis...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction: Case Studies in the Ethics of Mental Health Research.J. Millum - 2012 - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 200:230-35.
Parity is Not Enough! Mental Health, Managed Care, and Medicaid.Matthew B. Lawrence - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (3):480-484.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-02

Downloads
19 (#824,913)

6 months
6 (#588,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability.Wendy Rogers, Catriona Mackenzie & Susan Dodds - 2012 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):11-38.
Vulnerable populations in research: The case of the seriously ill.Philip J. Nickel - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):245-264.
Vulnerability, vulnerable populations, and policy.Mary C. Ruof - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):411-425.

View all 10 references / Add more references