The Coaxing Architecture of Reddit’s r/science: Adopting Ethos-Assessment Heuristics to Evaluate Science Experts on the Internet

Social Epistemology 33 (6):514-524 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTConcerned with how individuals assess scientific experts on the Internet, our research investigates the virtual r/science subreddit and their popular Ask-Me-Anything series, where sci...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-09

Downloads
21 (#727,311)

6 months
4 (#1,004,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The role of trust in knowledge.John Hardwig - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (12):693-708.
Expertise and Conspiracy Theories.M. R. X. Dentith - 2018 - Social Epistemology 32 (3):196-208.
A guide to social epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2011 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 11-37.
Rhetorics of Expertise.Johanna Hartelius - 2011 - Social Epistemology 25 (3):211 - 215.

View all 7 references / Add more references