Sartre Studies International 15 (2):35-53 (2009)

Abstract
This paper compares Sartre's and Nancy's experience of the plurality of beings. After briefly discussing why Heidegger cannot provide such an experience, it analyzes the relation between the in-itself and for-itself in Sartre and between bodies and sense in Nancy in order to ask how this experience can be nauseating for Sartre, but meaningful for Nancy. First, it shows that the articulation of Being into beings is only a coat of veneer for Sartre while for Nancy Being is necessarily plural. Then, it contrasts Nausea as an experience without language with Nancy's thinking of the excription of sense in the thing
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.3167/ssi.2009.150203
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,081
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Being and Time.Ronald W. Hepburn - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56):276.
The Inoperative Community.Jean-Luc Nancy - 1991 - University of Minnesota Press.
A Guide to Heidegger’s Being and Time.Magda King - 2001 - State University of New York Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-16

Total views
88 ( #112,170 of 2,403,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,240 of 2,403,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes