Divine Perfection and Creation

Heythrop Journal 57 (1):122-134 (2016)
Abstract
Proclus (c.412-485) once offered an argument that Christians took to stand against the Christian doctrine of creation ex nihilo based on the eternity of the world and God’s perfection. John Philoponus (c.490-570) objected to this on various grounds. Part of this discussion can shed light on contemporary issues in philosophical theology on divine perfection and creation. First I will examine Proclus’ dilemma and John Philoponus’ response. I will argue that Philoponus’ fails to rebut Proclus’ dilemma. The problem is that presentism is incompatible with divine simplicity, timelessness, and a strong doctrine of immutability. From there I will look at how this discussion bears on contemporary understandings of divine perfection and creation, and argue that there are at least two possible ways contemporary philosophical theologians can try to get around the dilemma. One option is to adopt four-dimensional eternalism and maintain the traditional account of the divine perfections. I argue that this option suffers from difficulties that are not compatible with Christian belief. The other option is to keep presentism and modify the divine perfections. I argue that this option is possible and preferable since our understanding of the divine perfections must be modified in light of divine revelation and the incarnation.
Keywords Divine Eternity  Divine Immutability  Divine Simplicity  Presentism  Eternalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00708.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Ontology.Trenton Merricks - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
A Future for Presentism.Craig Bourne - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Presentism and the Objection From Being-Supervenience.Brian Kierland & Bradley Monton - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):485-497.
Making Sense of Divine Simplicity.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):3-30.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Divine Immutability.Timothy Pawl - 2009 - The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Omniscience, Tensed Facts and Divine Eternity.William Lane Craig - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228.
Making Sense of Divine Simplicity.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):3-30.
Divine Simplicity and Divine Command Ethics.Susan Peppers-Bates - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):361-369.
Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom.W. Matthews Grant - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
Back to Eternalism.Katherin Rogers - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.
God Inside Time and Before Creation.Dean Zimmerman - 2002 - In Gregory E. Ganssle & David M. Woodruff (eds.), God and Time: Essays on the Divine Nature. Oxford Up. pp. 75--94.
Response To: Divine Responsibility Without Divine Freedom. [REVIEW]William L. Rowe - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (1):37 - 48.
Divine Authority and Divine Perfection.Mark C. Murphy - 2001 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (3):155-177.
A Jewish Modified Divine Command Theory.Kavka Martin & Rashkover Randi - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):387 - 414.
Eternal God: A Study of God Without Time.Paul Helm - 1988 - Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-09-28

Total downloads

104 ( #48,882 of 2,177,979 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #166,489 of 2,177,979 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums