Too much of a good thing? Enhancement and the burden of self-determination

Neuroethics 3 (2):109-119 (2010)
Abstract
There is a remedy available for many of our ailments: Psychopharmacology promises to alleviate unsatisfying memory, bad moods, and low self-esteem. Bioethicists have long discussed the ethical implications of enhancement interventions. However, they have not considered relevant evidence from psychology and economics. The growth in autonomy in many areas of life is publicized as progress for the individual. However, the broadening of areas at one’s disposal together with the increasing individualization of value systems leads to situations in which the range of options asks too much of the individual. I scrutinize whether increased self-determination and unbound possibilities are really in a person’s best interests. Evidence from psychology and economics challenges the assumption that unlimited autonomy is best in all cases. The responsibility for autonomous self-formation that comes with possibilities provided by neuro-enhancement developments can be a burden. To guarantee quality of life I suggest a balance of beneficence, support, and respect for autonomy.
Keywords Neuroenhancement  Psychopharmacology  Choice  Autonomy  Well-being
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-010-9072-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,694
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century.Neil Levy - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
The Theory and Practice of Autonomy.Gerald Dworkin - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical.Martha J. Farah - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):34-40.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Human Enhancement, Social Solidarity and the Distribution of Responsibility.John Danaher - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):359-378.
Autonomy Support to Foster Individuals' Flourishing.Saskia K. Nagel & Peter B. Reiner - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):36 - 37.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Moral Enhancement and Freedom.John Harris - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (2):102-111.
Should We Enhance Self-Esteem?Rebecca Roache - 2007 - Philosophica 79:71-91.
Cognitive Disability in a Society of Equals.Jonathan Wolff - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):402-415.
Human Nature and Enhancement.Allen Buchanan - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (3):141-150.
Moral Enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.
Identity Crisis: Face Recognition Technology and Freedom of the Will.Benjamin Hale - 2005 - Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (2):141 – 158.
Addressing Disadvantage and the Human Good.Jonathan Wolff - 2002 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (3):207–218.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Added to PP index
2010-05-07

Total downloads
94 ( #56,905 of 2,197,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #43,936 of 2,197,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature