Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures: Hooke, Newton, and the “Compounding of the Celestiall Motions of the Planets.” [Book Review]

Isis 96:436-436 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The structure of a scientific controversy: Hooke versus Newton about colors.Maurizio Mamiani - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 143.
Hooke and the Law of Universal Gravitation: A Reappraisal af a Reappraisal.Richard S. Westfall - 1967 - British Journal for the History of Science 3 (3):245-261.
Twenty-nine years in the making: Newton's opticks.Alan E. Shapiro - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (4):pp. 417-438.
Schopenhauer on Newton and Hooke.Hereward Carrington - 1913 - The Monist 23 (3):439-458.
Euler, Newton, and Foundations for Mechanics.Marius Stan - 2013 - In Chris Smeenk & Eric Schliesser (eds.), Newton's Principia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-22.
Newton's Early Thoughts on Planetary Motion: A Fresh Look.Derek T. Whiteside - 1964 - British Journal for the History of Science 2 (2):117-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
2 (#1,755,150)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references