Review: No Morality, No Self, by James Doyle [Book Review]

Ethics 130 (1):102-106 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

James Doyle’s book is provocative and timely. It is an important contribution to the current wave of Anscombe scholarship, and it offers valuable insights into general metaethical ques­tions, such as: In what senses might morality be “unintelligible”? Or: To what extent does a divine law ethics rest on practical reason? Here, I do not want to summarize the many ad­mirable features of Doyle’s book. I will instead focus on his two main theses, of which I re­main unconvinced.

Similar books and articles

No Morality, No Self: Anscombe’s Radical Skepticism.James Doyle - 2017 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Schopenhauer's Rejection of the Moral Ought.Stephen Puryear - 2021 - In Patrick Hassan (ed.), Schopenhauer's Moral Philosophy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. pp. 12-30.
Rationalism in Ethics.Noell Birondo - 2022 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley. pp. 4329-4338.
Ethics and Religion.Harry J. Gensler - 2016 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Moral Normativity: Naturalism vs. Theism.Ferhat Yöney - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 93 (1):3-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-12

Downloads
334 (#63,696)

6 months
128 (#33,722)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katharina Nieswandt
Concordia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
Anscombe on the Sources of Normativity.Katharina Nieswandt - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (1):141-163.

Add more references