Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (2):403-415 (2015)

The capability approach, originated by Amartya Sen is among the most comprehensive and influential accounts of justice that applies to issues of health and health care. However, although health is always presumed as an important capability in Sen’s works, he never manages to fully explain why health is distinctively valuable. This paper provides an explanation. It does this by firstly laying out the general capability-based argument for health justice. It then discusses two recent attempts to justify why health is distinctively valuable from within a capability framework – these are Sridhar Venkatapuram’s conception of health as the central human meta-capability and, respectively, Norman Daniels’ embrace of the capability metric in his use of Rawls’ principle of fair equality of opportunity. The paper argues that none of these accounts succeed in providing a plausible justification of the value of health. Finally, the paper suggests an alternative more complex justification, closely tied to different but central element of the capability view, that captures the core intuitions of both Venkatapuram and Daniels’ accounts but without being vulnerable to the objections raised against each of them. This, the paper concludes, provides a promising ground on which the capability view on health justice should be founded
Keywords Capabilities  Health  Justice  Daniels  Venkatapuram
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-014-9526-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is the Point of Equality?Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly.Norman Daniels - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.Richard J. Arneson - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
Disadvantage.Jonathan Wolff & Avner de-Shalit - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Inequality Reexamined.John Roemer & Amartya Sen - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (3):554.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Playing for Social Equality.Lasse Nielsen - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (4):427-446.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Real and Alleged Problems for Daniels's Account of Health Justice.J. Paul Kelleher - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (4):388-399.
Shared Health Governance.Jennifer Prah Ruger - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (7):32 - 45.
Rawlsian Justice and a Human Right to Health Care.John C. Moskop - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):329-338.
Norman Daniels. Just Health.T. Wilkinson - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):268-272.
Just Health Care : Is Equality Too Much?Leonard M. Fleck - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (4).
Just Health. [REVIEW]T. M. Wilkinson - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (3):268-272.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #305,043 of 2,419,525 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #350,791 of 2,419,525 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes