Theoria 22 (3):325-329 (2007)
Atocha Aliseda’s Abductive Reasoning (2006) gives a structural characterization of the “forward” explana-tory reasoning from a theory to observational data. This paper asks whether there are any interesting structural rules for the “backward” abductive reasoning from observations to explanatory theories. Ignoring statistical cases, a partial explication of abduction is converse deductive explanation: h is abducible from e iff h deductively explains e. This relation of abducibility trivially satisfies Converse Entailment (if h entails e, then h is abducible from e ), but it does not generally satisfy Converse Consequence (if h is abducible from e and g entails h, then g is abducible from e ), since deductive explanation is not always transitive
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mathematical Reasoning Vs. Abductive Reasoning: A Structural Approach.Atocha Aliseda - 2003 - Synthese 134 (1-2):25 - 44.
Problems with Peirce's Concept of Abduction.Michael Hoffmann - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (3):271-305.
Advice on Abductive Logic.Dov Gabbay & John Woods - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):189-219.
Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking, and Coherence.P. Thagard & C. P. Shelley - 1997 - In [Book Chapter].
Ignorance and Semantic Tableaux: Aliseda on Abduction.John Woods - 2007 - Theoria 22 (3):305-318.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads70 ( #74,524 of 2,164,542 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,971 of 2,164,542 )
How can I increase my downloads?