Local Causality and Completeness: Bell vs. Jarrett [Book Review]
Foundations of Physics 39 (3):273-294 (2009)
J.S. Bell believed that his famous theorem entailed a deep and troubling conflict between the empirically verified predictions of quantum theory and the notion of local causality that is motivated by relativity theory. Yet many physicists continue to accept, usually on the reports of textbook writers and other commentators, that Bell’s own view was wrong, and that, in fact, the theorem only brings out a conflict with determinism or the hidden-variables program or realism or some other such principle that (unlike local causality), allegedly, nobody should have believed anyway. Moreover, typically such beliefs arise without the person in question even being aware that the view they are accepting differs so radically from Bell’s own. Here we try to shed some light on the situation by focusing on the concept of local causality that is the heart of Bell’s theorem, and, in particular, by contrasting Bell’s own understanding with the analysis of Jon Jarrett which has been the most influential source, in recent decades, for the kinds of claims mentioned previously. We point out a crucial difference between Jarrett’s and Bell’s own understanding of Bell’s formulation of local causality, which turns out to be the basis for the erroneous claim, made by Jarrett and many others, that Bell misunderstood the implications of his own theorem
|Keywords||Bell’s theorem EPR Local causality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy.J. S. Bell - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics.Tim Maudlin - 2002 - Blackwell.
Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism: A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics.Michael Redhead - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments.Jon P. Jarrett - 1984 - Noûs 18 (4):569-589.
Bell's Theorem: A Guide to the Implications.Jon P. Jarrett - 1989 - In James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 60--79.
Citations of this work BETA
New Slant on the EPR-Bell Experiment.P. W. Evans, H. Price & K. B. Wharton - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):297-324.
Non-Local Common Cause Explanations for EPR.Matthias Egg & Michael Esfeld - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (2):181-196.
How to Account for Quantum Non-Locality: Ontic Structural Realism and the Primitive Ontology of Quantum Physics.Michael Esfeld - 2017 - Synthese 194 (7):2329-2344.
Quantum Causal Models, Faithfulness, and Retrocausality.W. Evans Peter - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw037.
Similar books and articles
Counterfactual Definiteness and Local Causation.Brian Skyrms - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (1):43-50.
Hidden Locality, Conspiracy and Superluminal Signals.Frederick M. Kronz - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):420-444.
Non-Local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality.Jeffrey Bub & Vandana Shiva - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:45-53.
Minimal Assumption Derivation of a Bell-Type Inequality.Gerd Graßhoff, Samuel Portmann & and Adrian Wüthrich - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):663 - 680.
Non-Local Realistic Theories and the Scope of the Bell Theorem.Federico Laudisa - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (12):1110-1132.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads157 ( #30,139 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?