Journal of Indian Philosophy 46 (4):695-712 (2018)

David Nowakowski
Princeton University
In the course of his critique of the Buddhist doctrine of universal momentariness, Udayana argues for an isomorphism between our understandings of space and time, which is meant to undercut the Buddhists’ well-known “inference from existence.” The present paper examines these arguments from Udayana’s Ātmatattvaviveka, together with Ratnakīrti’s treatment of them in his Kṣaṇabhaṅgasiddhi Anvayātmikā. As an historical study, the paper aims to elucidate the connections between Udayana and Ratnakīrti, and the implications of those connections for the dependence of the inference from existence upon various arguments which appear elsewhere in Ratnakīrti’s corpus. As a work of philosophical interpretation, the paper will clarify what is at stake in the local debate over the space–time isomorphism. Ratnakīrti’s position will best be understood as an account on which different simple causal properties are ascribed, or indexed, to an allegedly persisting entity at different times, while Udayana will prefer an account on which complex properties indexed to the place and/or time of the effect—for instance, “generating a sprout in this particular place” or “producing a visual awareness at a certain time”—will belong to a persisting thing throughout its entire existence. Furthermore, the acceptance or rejection of space and time as substantial entities in their own right, as distinct from the entities which are conventionally said to exist in space and time, will have important implications for the accounts of causality that each thinker can accept.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-018-9359-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,343
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Incompatibility and the Proof of the Buddhist Theory of Momentariness.Jeson Woo - 2001 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 (4):423-434.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Space and Time: The Ongoing Quest. [REVIEW]Eftichios Bitsakis - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (1):57-83.
Mo-bien's Conceptions of Time and Space.Xiyan Xu - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (7):628-637.
Eternity, Time, and Space.Wolfhart Pannenberg - 2005 - Zygon 40 (1):97-106.
Raumwissenschaften.Stephan Günzel (ed.) - 2009 - Suhrkamp.
Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.


Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #511,952 of 2,445,342 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,131 of 2,445,342 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes