A Logical Hole the Chinese Room Avoids

Minds and Machines 21 (3):431-433 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Searle’s Chinese room argument (CRA) was recently charged as being unsound because it makes a logical error. It is shown here that this charge is based on a misinterpretation of the modal scope of a major premise of the CRA and that the CRA does not commit the logical error with which it is charged

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A logical hole in the chinese room.Michael John Shaffer - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (2):229-235.
The logic of Searle’s Chinese room argument.Robert I. Damper - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):163-183.
Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room.Jason Ford - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):57-72.
The chinese room argument--dead but not yet buried.Robert I. Damper - 2004 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (5-6):159-169.
Minds, machines and Searle.Stevan Harnad - 1989 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1 (4):5-25.
Minds, machines and Searle.Stevan Harnad - 1989 - Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence 1:5-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-21

Downloads
19 (#825,863)

6 months
161 (#22,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The chinese room argument.David Cole - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A logical hole in the chinese room.Michael John Shaffer - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (2):229-235.

Add more references