Human Studies 37 (3):351-367 (2014)

The paper explores Wittgenstein’s notion of grammar in the sense of a discipline or an activity, as opposed to the object sense of the term (grammar as a body of rules for the use of a language). I argue that the Wittgensteinian activity of grammar consists in giving expression to rules of our language use. It differs from the traditional grammarian’s activity not only in focusing on a different type of rules, but also in that it does not aim at an explicit and exhaustive treatment of a specific domain of language. Instead, Wittgenstein conceives its goal as therapeutic: the dissolution of particular philosophical problems. Further, I attempt to reconcile his seemingly contradictory remarks on the character of grammatical statements, defining the senses in which they respectively can, and cannot, be considered descriptive assertions. I confront G. P. Baker’s and P. M. S. Hacker’s conceptions of the Wittgensteinian grammatical activity and I argue in favour of the former. Finally, I critically examine N. Garver’s claim that Wittgenstein, in his later conception of philosophy as grammar, succeeded in formulating a successfully self-referential criterion of philosophical critique. I also argue that grammatical activity, despite Wittgenstein’s overt commitment, is in fact not the only method of his later philosophy
Keywords Wittgenstein  Grammar  Rules  Descriptiveness  Critique
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10746-014-9314-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,908
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
Making It Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Analysis and Explanation in the Philosophical Investigations.José Pedro Correia - 2019 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 22 (1):53-71.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Givenness of Grammar: A Reply to Steven Affeltd.Steven Mulhall - 1998 - European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):32–44.
What Is Wrong Indeed?P. M. S. Hacker - 2013 - Philosophical Investigations 36 (3):251-268.
Wittgenstein on Grammar, Theses and Dogmatism.Peter M. S. Hacker - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (1):1-17.
The Complexity of Wittgenstein's Methods.Rom Harré - 2008 - Philosophy 83 (2):255-265.
Some Remarks on 'Language' and 'Grammar'.Gordon Baker - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 42 (1):107-131.
Wittgenstein and the Limits of Musical Grammar.H. Appelqvist - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (3):299-319.


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #322,535 of 2,497,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,370 of 2,497,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes