Theoria 57 (1-2):42-76 (1991)
According to the axiologist the value concepts are basic and the deontic concepts are derivative. This paper addresses two fundamental problems that arise for the axiologist. Firstly, what ought the axiologist o understand by the value of an act? Second, what are the prospects in principle for an axiological representation of moral theories. Can the deontic concepts of any coherent moral theory be represented by an agent-netural axiology: (1) whatever structure those concepts have and (2) whatever the causal structure of the world happens to be. We show that the answer is "almost always". The only substantive constraint is that autonomous moral agents cannot have the power to simultaneously block the options open to other autonomous moral agents. But this seems to be part and parcel of the notion of an autonomous moral agent.
|Keywords||consequentializing moral theories generalized axiology axiological representation of deontic content|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Content, Consequence and Likeness Approaches to Verisimilitude: Compatibility, Trivialization, and Underdetermination.Graham Oddie - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1647-1687.
A Royal Road to Consequentialism?Martin Peterson - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):153-169.
Modelling the Moral Dimension of Decisions.Mark Colyvan, Damian Cox & Katie Steele - 2010 - Noûs 44 (3):503-529.
Similar books and articles
Teleology, Consequentialism, and the Past.Peter Vallentyne - 1988 - Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2):89-101.
Complementation in Representable Theories of Region-Based Space.Torsten Hahmann & Michael Grüninger - 2013 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (2):177-214.
Trust, Staking, and Expectations.Philip J. Nickel - 2009 - Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (3):345–362.
Act and Maxim: Value-Discrepancy and Two Theories of Power.Graham Oddie - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):71-92.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Legal and Moral Analysis. [REVIEW]Bill Shaw - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (10):789 - 795.
Against Maximizing Act-Consequentialism (December 2, 2010) in Moral Theories Edited by Jamie Dreier (Blackwell Publishers, 2006), Pp. 21-37. [REVIEW]Peter Vallentyne - 2006 - In Dreier Jamie (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theories. Blackwell.
The Argument From Self-Creation: A Refutation of Act-Consequentialism and a Defense of Moral Options.Alex Rajczi - 2011 - American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):315.
Virtue Ethics and Repugnant Conclusions.Matt Zwolinski & David Schmidtz - 2005 - In R. Sandler & P. Cafaro (eds.), Environmental Virtue Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 107--17.
Gibbs and the Problems of Satisfaction and Well-Being.Michael Schwartz - 2009 - Business Ethics 18 (4):408-411.
The Epistemic Problem Does Not Refute Consequentialism.Tyler Cowen - 2006 - Utilitas 18 (4):383.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads97 ( #50,906 of 2,152,238 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #30,369 of 2,152,238 )
How can I increase my downloads?