In Diego E. Machuca (ed.), New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism. Brill. pp. 27-40 (2011)

Tim O'Keefe
Georgia State University
In Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Sextus Empiricus takes pains to differentiate the skeptical way of life from other positions with which it is often confused, and in the course of this discussion he briefly explains how skepticism differs from Cyrenaicism. Surprisingly, Sextus does not mention an important apparent difference between the two. The Cyrenaics have a positive epistemic commitment--that we can apprehend our own feelings. Although we cannot know whether the honey is really sweet, we can know infallibly that right now we are being sweetened. By contrast, Sextus says explicitly that, as skeptics, Pyrrhonists apprehend nothing whatsoever. A case can (and has) been made that Sextus does not mention this difference because, on this matter, there really isn't an important difference between the two: the skeptic is perfectly able to report how things appear to him, e.g., that the honey seems sweet, and it is crucial for the skeptic that he not abolish the appearances. But, I argue, what the skeptics are doing when they report how things appear to do is importantly different from the sort of immediate, infallible apprehension of one's own feelings claimed by the Cyrenaics, as the latter involves theoretical commitments to the nature of one's feelings that the skeptic eschews
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,044
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Anaxarco de Abdera.Ignacio Pajón Leyra - 2019 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 27:02704-02704.
Review of Ugo Zilioli, The Cyrenaics. [REVIEW]Tim O'Keefe - 2013 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:0-0.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Pyrrhonists Act Normally?Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Philosophical Explorations 15 (3):277-289.
Cyrenaics.Tim O'Keefe - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Is Pyrrhonism Psychologically Possible?Brian Ribeiro - 2002 - Ancient Philosophy 22 (2):319-331.
Sextus Empiricus on the Possibility of Inquiry.Filip Grgic - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):436-459.
The Skeptic Way: Sextus Empiricus's "Outlines of Pyrrhonism" (Review).David K. Glidden - 1998 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (3):460-462.
Giving the Sceptic a Good Name.Alastair Hannay - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):409 – 436.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #241,701 of 2,433,563 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #217,362 of 2,433,563 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes