Reply to Richard Davis

Philosophia Christi 11 (2):423-436 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a response to a paper by Rich Davis in which he argues that David Lewis' modal realism is inconsistent with classical theism. I provide what I take to be a coherent modal realist formulation of classical theism.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-21

Downloads
285 (#73,860)

6 months
61 (#89,556)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

God’s Place in Logical Space.Andrew Dennis Bassford - 2021 - Journal of Analytic Theology 9:100-125.
God’s place in the world.Matthew James Collier - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (1):43-65.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modal theistic arguments.Graham Oppy - 1993 - Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
A Leibnizian cosmological argument.Brian Leftow - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 57 (2):135 - 155.
God and Modal Concretism.Richard Davis - 2008 - Philosophia Christi 10 (1):57-74.

Add more references