Belief representation in a deductivist type-free doxastic logic

Minds and Machines 4 (2):163-203 (1994)
Konolige''s technical notion of belief based on deduction structures is briefly reviewed and its usefulness for the design of artificial agents with limited representational and deductive capacities is pointed out. The design of artificial agents with more sophisticated representational and deductive capacities is then taken into account. Extended representational capacities require in the first place a solution to the intensional context problems. As an alternative to Konolige''s modal first-order language, an approach based on type-free property theory is proposed. It considers often neglected issues, such as the need for a more general account of thede dicto-de re distinction, and quasi-indicators. Extended deductive capacities require a subdivision of Konolige''s notion of belief into two distinct technical notions,potential anddispositional belief. The former has to do with what an artificial agent could in principle come to actively believe, given enough time and its specific logical competence; the latter with what an agent can be assumed to believe with respect to a specific goal to be fulfilled.
Keywords Artificial agent  belief  doxastic logic  intensional logic  logical omniscience  multiagent domain  semantic representation  type-free property theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00974144
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,812
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
Knowledge and Belief.Jaakko Hintikka - 1962 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

View all 54 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Property Theory and the Revision Theory of Definitions.Francesco Orilia - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):212-246.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Incorporation of Moorean Type Information by Introspective Agents.Jiahong Guo - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):470-482.
Belief Revision in a Temporal Framework.Giacomo Bonanno - 2008 - In Krzysztof Apt & Robert van Rooij (eds.), New Perspectives on Games and Interaction. Amsterdam University Press.
Moore Problems in Full Dynamic Doxastic Logic.Krister Segerberg - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):95-110.
A Deduction Model of Belief.Kurt Konolige - 1986 - Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
18 ( #308,601 of 2,231,535 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #264,176 of 2,231,535 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature