- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why even diminishing principles of entitlement must be regulated by strictly egalitarian principles: discussion of morality of freedom
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 14 (1):158-168 (2016)
Abstract
In this article for a symposium on Joseph Raz's Morality of Freedom, I argue, contrary to Raz, that there is a sound case for the regulation of diminishing principles by strictly egalitarian principles.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Can Raz consistently suppose that fundamental moral principles are satiable?Terence Rajivan Edward - manuscript
The neorepublican challenge to egalitarian-liberalism: evaluating justifications of redistributive institutions.Jürgen Sirsch & Doris Unger - 2021 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (7):1000-1023.
Perfectionist Arguments for Liberalism.Margaret Moore - 1993 - In Foundations of Liberalism. Oxford University Press UK.
Anti-Perfectionism and Autonomy in an Imperfect World: Comments on Joseph Raz’s The Morality of Freedom 30 Years On.John Christman - 2017 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 4 (1):5-25.
Hart and Raz on the Non-Instrumental Moral Value of the Rule of Law: A Reconsideration. [REVIEW]Mark J. Bennett - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (5):603-635.
Raz on Reasons, Reason, and Rationality: On Raz's From Normativity to Responsibility.Ruth Chang - 2013 - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies:1-21.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-10-07
Downloads
44 (#351,498)
6 months
5 (#836,928)
2016-10-07
Downloads
44 (#351,498)
6 months
5 (#836,928)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo