Expert Deference About The Epistemic and Its Metaepistemological Significance – Addendum

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):554-554 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Concluding Reflections.Bryan Frances - 2005 - In Scepticism Comes Alive. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Metaethics, Normativity, and Value : Introduction.Hichem Naar & Michele Palmira - 2016 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 11 (2-3):65-69.
Reply to Palmira.Nicolás Lo Guercio - 2013 - Logos and Episteme 4 (3):361-365.
The New Puzzle of Moral Deference.Max Lewis - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):460-476.
Metaepistemology.Mikkel Gerken - 2018 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
An English Daubert? Law, Forensic Science and Epistemic Deference.Tony Ward - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 15:26-36.
Uniqueness and Metaepistemology.Daniel Greco & Brian Hedden - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy 113 (8):365-395.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-06

Downloads
20 (#181,865)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michele Palmira
Complutense University of Madrid

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references