Platonism, De Re, and (Philosophy of) Mathematical Practice

In Bharath Sriraman (ed.), Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Cham: Springer. pp. 2307-2335 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The chapter advances a reformulation of the classical problem of the nature of mathematical objects (if any), here called “Plato’s problem,” in line with the program of a philosophy of mathematical practice. It then provides a sketch of a platonist solution, following the same perspective. This solution disregards as nonsensical the question of the existence of abstract, and specifically mathematical, objects, by rather focusing on the modalities of our access to them: objects (in general, both concrete and abstract) are regarded as individual contents that we have (or can have) a de re epistemic access to. The question of the existence of mathematical objects is then replaced by that of the modalities of our de re epistemic access to individual mathematical contents.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mathematical platonism meets ontological pluralism?Matteo Plebani - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (6):655-673.
Mathematical Pluralism and Platonism.Mark Balaguer - 2017 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (2):379-398.
Platonism and anti-Platonism in mathematics.Mark Balaguer - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Platonism in the Philosophy of Mathematics.Øystein Linnebo - 2014 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab.
Platonism and anti‐Platonism: Why worry?Mary Leng - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):65 – 84.
The nature of mathematical objects.Øystein Linnebo - 2008 - In Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America. pp. 205--219.
Platonism and the 'Epistemic Role Puzzle'.Mark McEvoy - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (3):289-304.
Problems with profligate platonism.Colin Cheyne - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):164-177.
Philosophy of Mathematics.Otávio Bueno - 2010-01-04 - In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 68–91.
Theism, Explanation, and Mathematical Platonism.C. P. Ruloff - 2020 - Philosophia Christi 22 (2):325-334.
Who's afraid of mathematical platonism? An historical perspective.Dirk Schlimm - 2024 - In Karine Chemla, José Ferreiròs, Lizhen Ji, Erhard Scholz & Chang Wang (eds.), The Richness of the History of Mathematics. Springer. pp. 595-615.
Uwagi o platonizmie matematycznym.Anna Lemańska - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (2).
Platonic Relations and Mathematical Explanations.Robert Knowles - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (3):623-644.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-27

Downloads
3 (#1,712,253)

6 months
3 (#976,418)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marco Panza
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references