Differences: Re-Reading Beauvoir and Irigaray

New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essays in this volume seek to resituate the work of Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray both historically and in light of the demands of contemporary feminist theory by examining unexplored aspects of their thought. Authors also highlight the commonalties in thought between the two philosophers, articulating points of dialogue in logic, ethics, and politics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Material Life: Bergsonian tendencies in Simone de Beauvoir’s philosophy.Alia Al-Saji - 2017 - In Emily Parker & Anne Van Leeuwen (eds.), Differences: Re-Reading Beauvoir and Irigaray. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 21-53.
Ambiguity and difference: Two feminist ethics of the present.Sara Heinämaa - 2017 - In Emily Parker & Anne Van Leeuwen (eds.), Differences: Re-Reading Beauvoir and Irigaray. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 137-176.
Simone de Beauvoir, Luce Irigaray. Una rilettura.Federica Giardini - 2016 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 28 (54).
Hegel and feminist philosophy.Kimberly Hutchings - 2003 - Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-18

Downloads
18 (#825,698)

6 months
5 (#836,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Emily Anne Parker
Towson University
Anne Van Leeuwen
James Madison University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references