What Proto-logic Could not be

Axiomathes 32 (6):1451-1482 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inspired by Bermúdez’s notion of proto-logic, I would like to fathom what the true proto-logic could be like. But this will be approached only in a negative way of figuring out what it could not be. I shall argue that it could not be purely deductive by exploiting the recent researches in logic of maps. This will allow us to reorient the search for proto-logic, starting with animal abduction. I will also suggest that proto-logic won’t get off the ground without proto-geometry. These negative results will shed some lights on some further conceptual and historical issues around the language of thought hypothesis to arrive at the true proto-logic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-03

Downloads
25 (#654,840)

6 months
12 (#243,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Woosuk Park
Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology (KAIST)

References found in this work

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.
Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence.John McCarthy & Patrick Hayes - 1969 - In B. Meltzer & Donald Michie (eds.), Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 463--502.
Inquiry.Robert Stalnaker - 1984 - Synthese 79 (1):171-189.
Abduction, Reason, and Science.L. Magnani - 2001 - Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Renewing Philosophy.Hilary Putnam - 1992 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 51 references / Add more references