Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):329-356 (2011)

J. David Velleman
New York University
Herlinde Pauer-Studer
University of Vienna
We discuss some implications of the Holocaust for moral philosophy. Our thesis is that morality became distorted in the Third Reich at the level of its social articulation. We explore this thesis in application to several front-line perpetrators who maintained false moral self-conceptions. We conclude that more than a priori moral reasoning is required to correct such distortions
Keywords Holocaust  Hannah Arendt  Barbara Herman  Adolf Eichmann
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-010-9246-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
The Practice of Moral Judgment.Barbara Herman - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (8):414-436.
The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt.Seyla Benhabib - 2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Moral Literacy.Barbara Herman - 2007 - Harvard University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Genocide Denial as Testimonial Oppression.Melanie Altanian - 2021 - Social Epistemology 35 (2):133-146.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Meaning Normative?Anandi Hattiangadi - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (2):220-240.
Humean Sources of Normativity.Herlinde Pauer-Studer - 2010 - In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 186.
Morality, Normativity, and Society.David Copp - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
Normativity and Interpersonal Reasons.Ken O'Day - 1998 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):61-87.


Added to PP index

Total views
882 ( #6,562 of 2,456,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #21,616 of 2,456,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes