Must God Be Incorporeal?

Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):76-87 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Natural theologians have argued that God (logically) must be incorporeal, without body or parts. This conclusion apparently contradicts the common Christian beliefs that God (the Son) was incarnate in the person of Jesus of Nazareth, and now exists everlastingly with a resurrected body. In this paper, I examine the most common rational arguments for divine incorporeality and show that none of them is sufficient to prove it, and that, therefore, none need be a stumbling block to rational acceptance of the resurrected Christ as God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him.Elmer L. Towns - 2009 - Regal Books. Edited by Charles Billingsley.
Composition and Christology.Brian Leftow - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):310-322.
On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'.David Twetten - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
Perceiving an imperceptible God.Edward L. Schoen - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (4):433-455.
God's point of view: A reply to Mander.Yujin Nagasawa - 2003 - Heythrop Journal 44 (1):60–63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
58 (#275,185)

6 months
14 (#175,970)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Lamont Paulsen
Brigham Young University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references