8 found
See also
David Lamont Paulsen
Brigham Young University
  1.  10
    Neurocognitive Development of Risk Aversion From Early Childhood to Adulthood.David J. Paulsen, R. McKell Carter, Michael L. Platt, Scott A. Huettel & Elizabeth M. Brannon - 2011 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5.
  2. The God of Abraham, Isaac, and (William) James.David W. Paulsen - 1999 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 13 (2):114-146.
  3. Divine Determinateness and the Free Will Defence.David L. Paulsen - 1980 - Analysis 41 (3):150 - 153.
  4.  87
    Joseph Smith and the Trinity: An Analysis and Defense of the Social Model of the Godhead.David Paulsen & Brett Mcdonald - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):47-74.
    The theology of Joseph Smith remains controversial and at times divisive in the broader Christian community. This paper takes Smith’s trinitarian theologyas its point of departure and seeks to accomplish four interrelated goals: (1) to provide a general defense of “social trinitarianism” from some of the major objections raised against it; (2) to express what we take to be Smith’s understanding of the Trinity; (3) to analyze the state of modern ST and (4) to argue that, as a form of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
  5. Comparative Coherency of Mormon and Classical Theism.David Lamont Paulsen - 1975 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
    Export citation  
  6. Edward O. Wilson, "Sociobiology: The New Synthesis". [REVIEW]David W. Paulsen - 1976 - Theory and Decision 7 (3):239.
    No categories
    Export citation  
  7.  42
    Must God Be Incorporeal?David Paulsen - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):76-87.
    Natural theologians have argued that God (logically) must be incorporeal, without body or parts. This conclusion apparently contradicts the common Christian beliefs that God (the Son) was incarnate in the person of Jesus of Nazareth, and now exists everlastingly with a resurrected body. In this paper, I examine the most common rational arguments for divine incorporeality and show that none of them is sufficient to prove it, and that, therefore, none need be a stumbling block to rational acceptance of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
  8.  65
    The Logically Possible, the Ontologically Possible and Ontological Proofs of God's Existence.David L. Paulsen - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (1):41 - 49.