Semantic WFF(x) specified syntactically

Abstract

Hypothesis: WFF(x) can be applied syntactically to the semantics of formalized declarative sentences such that: WFF(x) ↔ (x ↦ True) ∨ (x ↦ False) (see proof sketch below) For clarity we focus on simple propositions without binary logical connectives.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-27

Downloads
417 (#49,938)

6 months
57 (#93,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning postulates.Rudolf Carnap - 1952 - Philosophical Studies 3 (5):65 - 73.
Meaning Postulates.Rudolf Carnap - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (2):188-189.

Add more references