The challenge of religious pluralism: A reply to James Kraft

Sophia 45 (2):123-126 (2006)

Abstract
Religious pluralis does have, as James Kraft says, a negative impact on the epistemic confidence with which one holds a religious position, when epistemology is thought on both the externalist and internalist lines. I also conclude both that there is a resulting epistemic humility and that a tolerance of religious diversity results from it, but I reach these conclusions for entirely different reasons. Epistemic humility and religious tolerance are fostered by the realization that many religions are striving for the infinite, though all have limited views of it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF02782486
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,253
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity.Philip L. Quinn & Kevin Meeker (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A Rethinking of Contemporary Religious Tolerance.James J. Delaney & Jeffrey Dueck - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:73-82.
A Pragmatic Defense of Religious Exclusivism.Girard Brenneman - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:13-18.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
42 ( #202,006 of 2,269,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #835,177 of 2,269,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature