Can Robots think : reply to Tooley's second statement

In Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 218–232 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Can a Material Thing Think? Tooley's Reply to the Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tooley and evil: A reply.Alvin Plantinga - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (1):66 – 75.
Closing statement and reponse to Plantinga's comments.Michael Tooley - 2008 - In Alvin Plantinga (ed.), Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 233–248.
Public Institutions for Cooperative Action: A Reply to James Tooley.Stewart Ranson - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):35-42.
Moral appearances: emotions, robots, and human morality. [REVIEW]Mark Coeckelbergh - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):235-241.
Reply to Tooley's opening statement.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - In Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 151–183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
12 (#1,079,938)

6 months
7 (#419,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alvin Plantinga
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references