Monstrous Births and Medical Networks: Debates over Forensic Evidence, Generation Theory, and Obstetrical Authority in France, ca. 1780-1815

Early Science and Medicine 14 (5):599-629 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In France between 1780 and 1815, doctors opened a broad correspondence with medical faculties and public officials about foetal anomalies . Institutional and legal reforms forced doctors to encounter monstrous births with greater frequency, and they responded by developing new ideas about heredity and embryology to explain malformations to public officials. Though doctors achieved consensus on pathogenesis, they struggled to apply these ideas in forensic cases, especially with doubtful sex. Medical networks simultaneously allowed doctors to explore obstetrical techniques, as licensing regulations forced practitioners into emotional encounters with child anomalies. Doctors thus developed a new ethics for treating monstrosities, viewing them as pathological specimens, forensic objects, and obstetrical tragedies

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle on Monsters and the Generation of Kinds.Thomas V. Upton - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):21-36.
Some Neural Networks Compute, Others Don't.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2008 - Neural Networks 21 (2-3):311-321.
Playing with networks: how economists explain. [REVIEW]Caterina Marchionni - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (3):331-352.
Out of their minds: Legal theory in neural networks. [REVIEW]Dan Hunter - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):129-151.
Managing Corporations in Networks.Dirk Baecker - 2001 - Thesis Eleven 66 (1):80-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
39 (#408,642)

6 months
11 (#237,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A cabinet of the ordinary: domesticating veterinary education, 1766–1799.Kit Heintzman - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Science 51 (2):239-260.
Why Medicine Needs a Theology of Monstrosity.Devan Stahl - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (5):612-624.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Introduction.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1990 - Apeiron 23 (4):1-6.
Rapport.[author unknown] - 1949 - Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Philosophy 1:101-107.

Add more references