Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (S1):76-93 (2011)

The OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is increasingly depended upon by education policy makers to provide reliable measures of their country's education system against international benchmarks. PISA attempts to provide efficient, scientific and technical means to develop educational policies which achieve optimal outcomes (Berg & Timmermans, 2000, p. 31). This kind of scientific evidence is seen by policy makers as being free of prejudice and ideology. Science is expected to represent the truth, state universal facts and make predictions. Thus PISA seeks to rank countries' performances, work out future scenarios and offer policy direction. By what means does PISA gain knowledge and speak with confidence about diverse cultures and distant nations? How does it acquire a ‘voice from nowhere’ (Haraway, 1988; Suchman, 2000), and become a modern-day Oracle that countries might consult for policy advice? Modelled on early actor-network accounts of laboratory life, this ethnography traces how PISA knowledge comes to be made, guided by interview data with two ‘insiders’ in the ‘PISA laboratory’. It traces the translations and the circulating reference that turn PISA into a ‘centre of calculation’. It highlights how human and non-human entities are imbricated in the assembling of scientific facts and argues for a suspension of the divide between ‘science’ and ‘politics’. In the process, the paper offers an empirical instantiation of how some concepts from actor-network theory may be applied in the field of education policy, and ponders the implications of such an understanding for evidence based policy making
Keywords actor‐network theory  evidence‐based policy making  PISA
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00612.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Pandora’s Hope.Bruno Latour - 1998 - Harvard University Press.
Why Critique Has Run Out of Steam.Bruno Latour - 2004 - Critical Inquiry 30 (2):225-248.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Science Education and the Nature of Nature: Bruno Latour's Ontological Politics.Tristan Gleason - 2017 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 53 (6):573-586.
The Importance of Wonder in Human Flourishing.Jan B. W. Pedersen - 2020 - Wonder, Education, and Human Flourishing: Theoretical, Emperical and Practical Perspectives.
New Techniques of Difference: On Data as School Pupils.Ernst Thoutenhoofd - 2017 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 36 (5):517-532.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Knowledge and Skills for PISA—Assessing the Assessment.Nina Bonderup Dohn - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (1):1–16.
Education Policy, Research and Neuroscience: The Final Solution?Derek Sankey - 2008 - Australian Journal of Teacher Education 33 (3):31-43.


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #327,301 of 2,518,215 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,215 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes