The Common Consent Argument from Herbert to Hume

Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (3):401-433 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

various arguments for the existence of God have risen and fallen over the centuries, but the one that has perhaps fallen furthest is the argument from the universal consent of mankind. Put simply, the argument went as follows: near enough everyone, in near enough every nation, in near enough every historical era, has believed in God; therefore, God must exist. Or, as it was summarized in the strikingly Lincolnesque terms of Diderot’s Encyclopédie: “You can fool some of the people, or fool all of them in certain places and certain times, but not all people in all places and in all ages.”1 Universal agreement in the truth of a certain proposition was taken by many as a sufficient demonstration of that truth. This..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
27 (#608,699)

6 months
6 (#588,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jasper Reid
King's College London

Citations of this work

Religious Disagreement.Helen De Cruz - 2019 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Common Consent Argument for the Existence of Nature Spirits.Tiddy Smith - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):334-348.
Resuscitating the Common Consent Argument for Theism.Matthew Braddock - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 93 (3):189-210.
Common Consent Arguments for Belief in God.Marcus Hunt - 2022 - Dialogue: A Journal of Philosophy and Religion (58):17-22.
L’idée d’un sens commun à tous. Descartes et Herbert de Cherbury.Louis Rouquayrol - 2022 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 113 (1):21-38.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references