Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):493 – 508 (2002)

Rosamond Rhodes
CUNY Graduate Center
People who discuss medical ethics or bioethics come to very different conclusions about the levels of agreement in the field and the implications of consensus among health care professionals. In this paper I argue that these disagreements turn on a confusion of two distinct senses of medical ethics. I differentiate (1) medical ethics as a subject in applied ethics from (2) medical ethics as the professional moral commitments of health care professions. I then use the distinction to explain its significant implications for medical ethics education. Drawing on the recent work of John Rawls, I also show the centrality of philosophy in medical ethics by illustrating how contemporary philosophy can be used to construct an ethical framework for the medical professions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1076/jmep.27.4.493.8608
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
72 ( #134,675 of 2,386,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,015 of 2,386,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes