Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (3):337-364 (2004)

Mathias Risse
Harvard University
Left-libertarian theories of justice hold that agents are full self-owners and that natural resources are owned in some egalitarian manner. Some philosophers find left-libertarianism promising because it seems that it coherently underwrites both some demands of material equality and some limits on the permissible means of promoting such equality. However, the main goal of this article is to argue that, as far as coherence is concerned, at least one formulation of left-libertarianism is in trouble. This formulation is that of Michael Otsuka, who published it first in a 1998 article, and now in his thought-provoking book Libertarianism Without Inequality . In a nutshell, my objection is that the set of reasons that support egalitarian ownership of natural resources as Otsuka understands it stand in a deep tension with the set of reasons that would prompt one to endorse Otsuka’s right to self-ownership. In light of their underlying commitments, a defender of either of the views that left-libertarianism combines would actually have to reject the other. This incoherence, it seems, can only be remedied either by an approach that renders left-libertarianism incomplete in a way that can only be fixed by endorsing more commitments than most left-libertarians would want to or by an approach that leaves left-libertarianism a philosophically shallow theory. Key Words: equality • left-libertarianism • libertarianism • original appropriation • property • self-ownership.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X04046246
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Fragmentation of Value.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.
Equality.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.
The Fragmentation of Value.Thomas Nagel - 1998 - In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical Theory 2: Theories About How We Should Live. Oxford University Press.
Original Acquisition of Private Property.L. Wenar - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):799-820.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Freedom, Self-Ownership, and Equality in Steiner’s Left-Libertarianism.Ronen Shnayderman - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):219-227.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
95 ( #121,340 of 2,497,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,497,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes