The debate between mencius and hsün-Tzu: Contemporary applications

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25 (1):31-49 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article takes one of the richest historical debates, that of Hsun-Tzu and Mencius, as the contextual starting-point for the elaboration of human goodness. In support of Mencius, this article develops additional metaphysical and bio-social-evolutionary grounds, both of which parallel each other. The metaphysical analysis suggests that, in the spirit of Spinoza, an entity’s nature must necessarily include the drive toward its preservation. Likewise, the multi-faceted bio-social-evolutionary argument locates the fundamental telos of humanity in the preservation of social ties and species preservation, leading to a life-affirming philosophy and bio-psychological deduction of human emotions based on the primary emotion of love.

Similar books and articles

Hsün-tzŭ on terminology.Y. P. Mei - 1951 - Philosophy East and West 1 (2):51-66.
Mencius and early Chinese thought.Kwong-loi Shun - 1997 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Xunzi.David Elstein - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Why is Hsün Tzu Called A Legalist?T'ang Hsiao-Wen - 1976 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 8 (1):21-35.
A Descriptive Review of Hsün-Tzu's Thought.Liang Ch'I.-Hsiung - 1974 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 6 (1):4-60.
The humanist way in ancient China.Chʻu Chai - 1965 - New York,: Bantam Books. Edited by Winberg Chai.
Hsun Tzu on family and familial relations.Cecilia Wee - 2007 - Asian Philosophy 17 (2):127 – 139.


Added to PP

2,148 (#3,893)

6 months
222 (#10,639)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert E. Allinson
Soka University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What's basic about basic emotions?Andrew Ortony & Terence J. Turner - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (3):315-331.
Chinese philosophy: A characterization.Chung-ying Cheng - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):113 – 137.

Add more references