Descriptions and non-doxastic attitude ascriptions

Philosophical Studies 175 (6):1311-1331 (2018)

Abstract

This paper addresses a certain objection to the quantificational theory of definite descriptions. According to this objection, the quantificational account cannot provide correct interpretations of definite descriptions embedded in the non-doxastic attitude ascriptions and therefore ought to be rejected. In brief, the objection says that the quantificational theory is committed to the view that a sentence of the form “The F is G” is equivalent to the claim that there is a unique F and it is G, while the ascription such as, e.g., “S wants the F to be G” is not equivalent to the statement that S wants there to be a F and for it to be G. I argue that this objection is invalid as it rests on a false assumption concerning the substitutivity of the relative clauses in the non-doxastic attitude ascriptions.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-06

Downloads
318 (#34,328)

6 months
20 (#43,964)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
Inquiry.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1984 - Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (4):515-519.
Inquiry.Robert Stalnaker - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (3):425-448.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Existence Entailments of Definite Descriptions.Paul Elbourne - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (1):1-10.
Incomplete Descriptions.Marga Reimer - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (3):347 - 363.
Parasitic Attitudes.Emar Maier - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (3):205-236.
Content, Thoughts, and Definite Descriptions.Peter Millican - 1990 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 64 (1):167 - 220.
Sharvy's Theory of Definite Descriptions Revisited.Berit Brogaard - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):160–180.
Names as Disguised Descriptions.Mark John D'cruz - 1998 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Reference and Definite Descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.