- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is the science of positive intentional change a science of objective moral values?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4):435-436 (2014)
Abstract
I examine whether Wilson et al.'s argument for a science of positive intentional change constitutes an argument for a science of objective moral values. Drawing from their discussion, I present four reasons for thinking that it may be and some considerations on why it may not be. Concluding, I seek help from the authors. [Open Peer Commentary on a BBS article.]Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Intentional change, intrinsic motivations, and goal generation.Riccardo Manzotti & Paolo Moderato - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4):431-432.
Values in Ethics and Science: A Case Against Objective Moral Realism.Stephen Joseph Scales - 1995 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Toward an integrated science and sociotecture of intentional change.Robert Costanza & Paul Atkins - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4):421-422.
Niche construction is an important component of a science of intentional change.Michael J. O'Brien - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4):432-433.
Incorporating coordination dynamics into an evolutionarily grounded science of intentional change.Viviane Kostrubiec & J. A. Scott Kelso - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4):428-429.
Rational versus anti-rational interpretations of science: an ape-language case-study.Robert P. Farrell - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (1):83-100.
Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change.David Sloan Wilson, Steven C. Hayes, Anthony Biglan & Dennis D. Embry - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4):395-416.
The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray.Nick Chater & George Loewenstein - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e147.
Science and Philosophy: A Love–Hate Relationship.Sebastian De Haro - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (2):297-314.
Four Contributions Values Can Make to the Objectivity of Social Science.Sandra G. Harding - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:199 - 209.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-08-29
Downloads
64 (#246,451)
6 months
19 (#181,829)
2014-08-29
Downloads
64 (#246,451)
6 months
19 (#181,829)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo