Metaphor and Hyperbole: Testing the Continuity Hypothesis

Metaphor and Symbol 30 (1):24-40 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In standard Relevance Theory, hyperbole and metaphor are categorized together as loose uses of language, on a continuum with approximations, category extensions and other cases of loosening/broadening of meaning. Specifically, it is claimed that there are no interesting differences between hyperbolic and metaphorical uses. In recent work, we have set out to provide a more fine-grained articulation of the similarities and differences between hyperbolic and metaphorical uses and their relation to literal uses. We have defended the view that hyperbolic use involves a shift of magnitude along a dimension which is intrinsic to the encoded meaning of the hyperbole vehicle, while metaphor involves a multi-dimensional qualitative shift away from the encoded meaning of the metaphor vehicle. In this article, we present three experiments designed to test the predictions of this analysis, using a variety of tasks (paraph.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-21

Downloads
46 (#347,610)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Paula Rubio-Fernandez
University of Oslo
Robyn Anne Carston
University College London
Catherine Wearing
Wellesley College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references