- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Confucian reflective equilibrium: Why principlism is misleading for Chinese bioethical decision-making
Asian Bioethics Review 4 (1):4-13 (2012)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Principlism and Normative Systems.Óscar Vergara - 2016 - In José-Antonio Seoane & Pedro Serna (eds.), Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 57-71.
Bioethics as Methodological Case Resolution: Specification, Specified Principlism and Casuistry.Ana Smith Iltis - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):271-284.
Ruiping Fan.A. Reconstructionist Confucian & A. Human Sagely Dominion Over Nature - 2005 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32:105-122.
Ruiping Fan.Bioethical Exploration - 2002 - In Julia Lai Po-Wah Tao (ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im) Possibility of Global Bioethics. Kluwer Academic. pp. 2--369.
It's Not So Simple: A More Complex Behavioral and Psychological Perspective on Genetic Enhancement (and Diminishment).Frances Degen Horowitz - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):76-78.
The Environmental Ethics of Fan Ruiping’s Revisionist Confucianism.Ronnie Littlejohn - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (3):403-406.
Ruiping Fan.Moral Theories vsMoral Perspectives: - 2002 - In Julia Lai Po-Wah Tao (ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im) Possibility of Global Bioethics. Kluwer Academic.
Methods in bioethics: the way we reason now.John D. Arras - 2017 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress & Matthew Adams.
The Principlism-Confucianism Debate Continues.Leonardo D. de Castro - 2012 - Asian Bioethics Review 4 (1):1-3.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-28
Downloads
32 (#515,799)
6 months
7 (#491,733)
2013-10-28
Downloads
32 (#515,799)
6 months
7 (#491,733)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Will Confucian Values Help or Hinder the Crisis of Elder Care in Modern Singapore?Kathryn Muyskens - 2020 - Asian Bioethics Review 12 (2):117-134.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kfj6z uwo