Philosophy 60 (232):187-204 (1985)
Moral sceptics maintain that there are no objective moral values, or that there is no moral knowledge, or no moral facts, or that what looks like a statement which makes a moral judgment is not really a statement and does not have a truth-value. All of this is rather, unclear because all of it is negative. It will be necessary to remove some of this unclarity because my aim in this paper is to establish a proposition which may be summarized by saying: even if there are no objective moral values in one sense, there are objective moralvalues in another sense, and the latter values are good enough to do some of the jobs that objective values in the first sense would have done. A useful analogy might be that of a person who has lost her hand and has been given a prosthesis. In one sense the prosthesis is not as real as the hand, in another sense it is just as real ; most importantly, the person can do with the prosthesis enough of what she could do with the hand to make do
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Does the Is-Ought Issue Suggest a Transcendental Realm?Halil Turan - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:7-12.
Facts and Values: Philosophical Reflections From Western and Non-Western Perspectives.M. C. Doeser & J. N. Kraay (eds.) - 1986 - M. Nijhoff.
Max Webers Wertfreiheitspostulat Und Die Naturalistische Begründung Von Normen.Valer Ambrus - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):209-236.
Psychology's Facts and Values: A Perennial Entanglement.Svend Brinkmann - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (6):749 – 765.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads37 ( #140,790 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #45,332 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?