Fregean Theory and the Four Worlds Paradox: A Reply to David over

Philosophical Books 25 (1):7-11 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Believing in semantics.John C. Bigelow - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1):101--144.
Partial worlds and paradox.Elke Brendel - 1993 - Erkenntnis 39 (2):191 - 208.
A Paradox for Possible World Semantics.Michael J. Shaffer & Jeremy Morris - 2006 - Logique Et Analyse 49 (195):307-317.
Salmon on Fregean approaches to the paradox of analysis.Gary Kemp - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 78 (2):153 - 162.
Topological Trees: G H von Wright's Theory of Possible Worlds.David H. Sanford - 1998 - In TImothy Childers (ed.), The Logica Yearbook. Acadamy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
What Are Centered Worlds?Shen-yi Liao - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):294-316.
Possible worlds I: Modal realism.Louis DeRosset - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):998-1008.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
97 (#177,440)

6 months
53 (#85,891)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Salmón
University of California at Santa Barbara

Citations of this work

Modal Paradox: Parts and Counterparts, Points and Counterpoints.Nathan Salmon - 1986 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):75-120.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references