Discussion: Problems Regarding C. J. Ducasse's Analysis of a Proposition

Southern Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):257-265 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is a fact a true proposition?--A reply.C. J. Ducasse - 1942 - Journal of Philosophy 39 (5):132-136.
Peter Hare on the philosophy of curt John Ducasse.John R. Shook - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):47-52.
Ducasse and His Critics. [REVIEW]Ronald E. Santoni - 1977 - International Philosophical Quarterly 17 (2):219-232.
Comments regarding the Dommeyer-Ducasse disagreement.Ronald E. Santoni - 1962 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (1):125-126.
Ducasse, Hare, and 'non-assertorial negatives'.Ronald E. Santoni - 1971 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):95-97.
Expressing Propositions.Charles Sayward - 1980 - Proceedings of the 1979 Mid America Linguistics Conference 10:93-100.
The Multiple-Proposition Approach Reconsidered.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2009 - Logique Et Analyse 52 (208):423-440.
A note on Ducasse's perceivable causation.Nani L. Ranken - 1967 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 28 (December):269-270.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
14 (#971,788)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hare and Others on the Proposition.John Corcoran - 2011 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 15 (1):51-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references