Reconstructing Interactive Argumentative Discourse

Argumentation 11 (4):419-434 (1997)

Abstract
When analysing and evaluating discourse, the discourse itself, the speech event and the activity type it represents, forces the analyst to search for a theoretical and methodological framework which is suitable for analysing the activity exposed in the data. Interactive political argumentation demands both a theory of argumentation and a theory of spoken language to fully grasp what is going on in the discourse. The pragma-dialectical argumentation theory offers both analytical and evaluative tools, but rests upon a reconstruction of the argumentative discourse which is hierarchical and static. If applied to interactive argumentation this kind of reconstruction will not reveal interactive aspects of the parties' argumentation. On the other hand, conversation analysis, which concentrates on interactive aspects of the discourse, does not offer a tool for the evaluation of the quality of each party's argumentation.
Keywords Reconstruction  fallacies  pragma-dialectics and conversation analysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1007799305146
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,728
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Context.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):141-161.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-11

Total views
29 ( #295,962 of 2,264,684 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #863,502 of 2,264,684 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature