Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):725-728 (1999)
In reply to Wierzbicka's advocacy of semantic primitives we argue that talk of the semantic primitives repeats the fallacies addressed in the target article at a higher level. In reply to Malcolm's plea for a Wittgensteinian grammar of colour words, we argue that he uses words like “we” and “us” too easily, falling into the trap of “silly relativism.” In reply to McManus's science of word counts, we reiterate the nineteenth-century criticism that this method is based on an illegitimate application of seemingly rigorous statistical methods
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum.H. M. Malm - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):128-135.
Which Colour Space(s) is Shepard Talking About?Lieven Decock & Jaap van Brakel - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):661-662.
The Plasticity of Categories: The Case of Colour.Brakel J. Van - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1):103-135.
The Semiotic Dynamics of Colour.Luc Steels & Tony Belpaeme - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):515-524.
Colour is a Culturalist Category.J. van Brakel - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):507-508.
Colour Word Usage Within Languages Follows the Berlin and Kay Ordering.I. C. McManus - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):724-724.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #404,621 of 2,171,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,896 of 2,171,879 )
How can I increase my downloads?