Response to Barnes’s critique of Scerri and Worral

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):813-816 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
24 (#646,352)

6 months
4 (#1,006,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

State of the Field: Why novel prediction matters.Heather Douglas & P. D. Magnus - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):580-589.
Use-novel predictions and Mendeleev’s periodic table: response to Scerri and Worrall.Samuel Schindler - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):265-269.
Predictivism and the periodic table.Stephen G. Brush - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):256-259.
Predictive hypotheses are ineffectual in resolving complex biochemical systems.Michael Fry - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (2):25.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Prediction and the periodic table.Eric R. Scerri & John Worrall - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):407-452.

Add more references